MiCA ROUTING INFRASTRUCTURE


Infrastructure / Regulated Exchanges / EEA

Deterministic, compliance-enforced routing

for the regulated European digital asset institutions under MiCA.

V-LON operates as the enforcement layer between licensed CASPs — making cross-border settlement provably compliant at execution time, not reconstructed after the fact.

MiCA


DORA


TRF 2023/1113


The Current state

MiCA passporting enables regulated CASPs to operate across all 30 EEA jurisdictions under a single license. It does not provide a shared enforcement layer for cross-border transaction routing between institutions.

Every inter-CASP settlement today depends on bilateral compliance agreements, manual counterparty verification, and post-event logging. None of this satisfies deterministic audit requirements or produces cryptographically verifiable proof of enforcement at routing time.

Under MiCA Article 72, regulated entities must record and justify routing decisions. Under DORA Article 11, they must demonstrate operational continuity for critical ICT functions. Under TFR 2023/1113, originator and beneficiary data must travel with every institutional transfer. The infrastructure to enforce all three simultaneously — across jurisdictions, in real time — does not yet exist as a shared layer.

MiCA Art. 72 — Record-keeping MiCA Art. 73 — Business continuity DORA Art. 11 — ICT continuity TFR 2023/1113 — Travel Rule

WHAT V-LON PROVIDES

Four capabilities. One enforcement layer.

Each capability maps directly to a specific compliance requirement that inter-CASP routing currently cannot satisfy.

1. Deterministic Routing with Compliance Enforcement

Routing decisions are executed against encoded compliance rules — jurisdiction constraints, counterparty eligibility, and transaction limits — at the moment of routing, not audited afterward. Every decision is deterministic and reproducible.

→ Cross-border compliance enforcement

2. Cryptographic Proof of Every Routing Decision

Each routing event generates an immutable, cryptographically verifiable record — not a log entry, but a proof. Regulators and auditors receive evidence that enforcement occurred, not documentation that it was intended.

→ Audit defensibility under MiCA Art. 72

3. Physics-Verified Counterparty Authentication Enforcement

Counterparty verification is bound to physical execution characteristics rather than exchanged credentials. No shared secrets. No credential replay risk. Counterparty trust is established and re-established at each routing event without credential infrastructure.

→ Counterparty trust without credential exchange

4. Jurisdiction-Aware Fallback Routing Decision

When a primary counterparty becomes unavailable — due to suspension, delisting, or regulatory action — V-LON routes to a compliant alternative within jurisdictional constraints automatically. Operational continuity without compliance compromise.

→ DORA Art. 11 operational resilience


INFRASTRUCTURE FACTS

Verified operational parameters

< 1ms

Compliance verification latency across multi-continental infrastructure

Patent-Pending

Multiple patent applications filed. Physics-based security and federated compliance routing.

MiCA-Native

Architecture designed against MiCA, DORA, and TFR 2023/1113 from first principles. Not retrofitted.


Intended Audience

Built for a specific type of institution

YES

MiCA-licensed CASPs operating cross-border institutional flows across the EEA — where routing decisions carry compliance liability.

YES

Regulated exchanges and digital asset custodians whose audit obligations require provable enforcement records rather than post-event reconstructions.

YES

Compliance officers and CTOs responsible for DORA operational resilience planning who need documented fallback routing with jurisdictional enforcement.

NO

Unregulated platforms, retail infrastructure, or exchanges without active MiCA licensing or equivalent EEA regulatory registration.


Request an Architecture Briefing

20 minutes. Technical level. No sales process.
We present the routing enforcement architecture. You determine whether it addresses something real in your regulatory environment.

Access to full technical documentation is provided after the initial briefing.